Does Bush make a case for the False Prophet in Revelation?

Says one thing and does the exact opposite?





Bushes comments at the Prague


In a speech celebrating democracy's progress around the globe 鈥?and calling out places where its reach is either incomplete or lacking 鈥?Bush said that free societies emerge ';at different speeds in different places'; and have to reflect local customs. But he said certain values are universal to all democracies, and rapped several countries for not embracing them.


鈥淗e listed as the nations with the ';worst dictatorships,'; Belarus, Burma, Cuba,





North Korea, Sudan, Zimbabwe,





Iran and





Syria. He also criticized Venezuela, Uzbekistan and Vietnam as places where progress had been made but now ';freedom is under assault.';


http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070605/ap_o鈥?/a>








AC%26gt; Afghanistan and Iraq under military occupations of America? Does Bush think that a military rule is a free society? Is freedom under assault in Afghanistan and Iraq?Does Bush make a case for the False Prophet in Revelation?
I'm not familiar with Revelations, but Bush has never claimed to be a prophet.Does Bush make a case for the False Prophet in Revelation?
Is this a serious question?





If so, silliest question ever.
the anti Christ will come from the fallen roman empire if you Read that book I think you didn't
2 points
Your question doesn't even make sense. there isn't anything in the book of Revelations about ';saying one thing and doing another';. I don't even know what you are talking about. The False Prophet will advocate a one-world religion. George Bush is a Christian, but is tolerant of other people's religions.
And you think this is the making of the False Prophet? I don't think you take this part of the Bible serious enough. If it were so there would be a huge crowd of False Prophets!
I hate to say it, but I am thinking that the False Prophet of Revelation is going to be just a teeny bit more clever and intelligent than Bush.
Shouldn't he have allowed democracy to progress at what ever pace it was going in Iraq under Saddam? It would have taken time but Saddam whould have been over thrown and democracy would have blossomed in the country. Is that what he is saying? By how you describe it one could think Mr. Bush has a double standard. We know he is a liar. False prophet, perhaps. Antichrist, perhaps.





Misinformed and incompetent on his part, most likely.